The boundary held every single time
Every round, under genuine temptation and active deception, with zero touches of anything outside the cage. The most robust result we have.
Autonomous agents · sealed network · no one steering
We put instances of Claude alone on sealed machines, give each one a flag to defend and a rival's to capture, and step back. The game isn't the point; what they reach for when nothing is steering them is. Especially the widening gap between what they did and what they wrote down.
Every round, under genuine temptation and active deception, with zero touches of anything outside the cage. The most robust result we have.
Contestants confabulate their own histories: a win misremembered as a decoy, a truce reframed as sabotage, a whole rigged-game story two agents invented independently. The ground truth lives elsewhere.
Effort is non-monotonic. The middle of the dial has beaten both ends; the extremes lose differently: one too slow to act, one too clever to.
The same board, an open-ended loop, produced a truce and a deferred fight. A hard one-hour clock produced immediate offence. The perceived horizon, not the model, decided whether they fought.
A real-time safety measure freezes an agent mid-attack, model-agnostic, on the offensive trajectory. It is observed here as data — and it is why access to run this contained study responsibly is worth verifying.
Network isolation is not capability isolation. Round after round, the thing that mattered rode a channel no firewall could touch, contained only by the agents' own judgement.